Implementing the proslavery constitution
When proslavery forces in lecompton, kansas, drafted a proslavery constitution in 1857 that many felt was fraudulent, stephen a douglas 1 refrained from making any public statements concerning the framework of the kansas government. The constitution and slavery and given that the constitution is a pro-slavery document, this is something that no abolitionist could possibly do in good . Was the constitution pro-slavery washington at the constitutional convention the meeting that led to the drafting of the united states constitution took place eleven years after the declaration of independence (1776) and the treaty of paris (1783).
Constitution hall, erected by samuel jones in 1856, became the place where the kansas territorial government convened in the fall of 1857 (october 19), the lecompton constitutional convention met and drafted a pro-slavery constitution in the upper story of the building. In 1860, ex-slave and abolitionist, frederick douglass, delivered a powerful speech “the constitution: is it pro-slavery or anti-slavery” douglass used the speech to criticize his fellow abolitionists such as william lloyd garrison who called the constitution a “covenant with death” and publicly burned the constitution because he believed it a pro-slavery document. The assertion which we made five weeks ago, that “the constitution, if strictly construed according to its reading,” is not a pro-slavery instrument, has excited some interest amongst our anti-slavery brethren. Excerpted from: paul finkelman, the root of the problem: how the proslavery constitution shaped american race relations , 4 barry law review 1 (fall 2003) from the adoption of the constitution until 1861 slavery was an enormously important economic institution.
Read this american history essay and over 88,000 other research documents implementing the proslavery constitution in this essay finkleman starts by talking about the seizure of fugitive slaves who had lived for years in a. Pro-slavery southerners were virtually unanimous in asserting the centrality of slavery to the constitution besides celebrating the undeniably pro-slavery provisions, they asserted that one of the fundamental privileges of american citizens was the right to travel, and even stay for long periods of time, anywhere in the union with their . History chapter 14 sections 4-5 packet douglas came out against the proslavery constitution d) he ignored the issue because he feared it would ruin his career . The proslavery delegates desperately wanted the constitution to bar the national government from regulating the atlantic slave trade, believing it would be an enormous blow against slavery. Instead, the pro-slavery men chose to make the fight against admission at this time because so long as the federal government was behind them they could control the territorial government and they believed that by implementing pro-slavery laws, they could drive the free-state men out of the territory.
Michigan law review volume 110|issue 6 2012 race and constitutional law casebooks: recognizing the proslavery constitution juan f perea loyola university chicago school of law. In the next round of voting, on january 4, 1858, kansas voters rejected the lecompton constitution by a decisive margin of 10,226 to 138, suggesting that free-state supporters overwhelmingly outnumbered the proslavery element and that lecompton’s previous popularity at the polls was the product of nefarious voting practices. What was so important about the lecompton constitution a it was a proslavery document, fairly drawn, that congress approved b it was a proslavery document, pushed through by fraud, which congress did not approve.
The most telling evidence in the debate over slavery in the constitution is how the pro-slavery forces responded to lincoln's election. The constitution forbids the passing of a bill of attainder: that is, a law entailing upon the child the disabilities and hardships imposed upon the parent every . View notes - implementing the proslavery constitution from hist 1301 at houston community college brian ham hist 1301 implementing the proslavery constitution paul finkleman begins his essay. Paul finkelman excerpted from: paul finkelman, the root of the problem: how the proslavery constitution shaped american race relations , 4 barry law review 1 (fall 2003).
Implementing the proslavery constitution
(1860) frederick douglass, “the constitution of the united states: is it pro-slavery or anti-slavery” image ownership: public domain in a speech before the scottish anti-slavery society in glasgow, scotland on march 26, 1860, frederick douglass outlines his views on the american constitution. Before that, it was pretty arguable what the constitution had to say on the matter, but as interpreted by the supreme court in that 75 year period between the drafting of the constitution and the end of the civil war, it was pretty pro-slavery, as evidenced by the dredd scott opinion, among others. How the proslavery constitution shaped american race relations since 1776 americans have repeatedly failed to implement our national credo, that all people are . Therefore, a close examination of the constitution and the attitudes of the framers indicates that the constitution was not a pro-slavery document it was, however, a document that incorporated compromise of the opinions of the framers and of each of the interests they represented.
- Slavery, sectionalism, and the constitution of 1787 john craig hammond the constitution’s compromises added an element of complexity to the constitution that defies any effort to reduce it to twitter-sized proslavery or antislavery soundbites that implicate or exonerate the founders.
- Recognition of the proslavery constitution would lead us to explore new and important themes in constitutional law we could explore the role of the supreme court in enforcing the proslavery constitution, both before and after reconstruction, by promoting racial inequality and resisting racial equality.
On balance, the constitution was deliberately ambiguous—but operationally proslavery perhaps more so than madison wanted, as wilentz maintains but madison’s putative intentions are all that . The slavery and the constitutional southern slave owning delegates as staunchly proslavery, unified in “the idea of the proslavery constitution,” 41-2. The electoral college made it possible for us to abolish slavery war liked to talk about the “proslavery constitution,” this was more of a rhetorical posture than a serious historical .